Wednesday, August 8, 2012


Of Chicken, Coffee, Computers and Kisses

Recently, the owner of Chic-Fil-A came out against gay marriage. The nation was thrown into a tizzy as several mayors of large cities, forgetting the right to free speech, said they would not allow Chic-Fil-A to come into their respective cities. In response, last Wednesday, August 1, was unofficially declared "Support Chic-Fil-A Day" across the country. Angered, the gay community decided to protest by having gay couple kiss at Chic-Fil-A stores across the country.

On the other hand, Starbucks, America's most popular coffee outlet has declared their support for gay marriage as has the Apple Computer Company.

On Monday, July 30, I had a nice chicken sandwich at Chic-Fil-A. A few days later, I visited the local Apple Store, a favorite place of mine to spend money. I am not a coffee drinker, but love Starbucks hot chocolate and some of their goodies which have caused my blood pressure to spike. I will likely visit my local Starbucks at my earliest opportunity.

I am a Mormon. Tom Hanks, one of my favorite actors, has made outrageous comments about my Church showing a complete lack of understanding of what we believe and practice. Will I stop going to Tom Hanks movies or discontinue my 28 year love affair with Apple products? Of course not!

We have become so sensitive and reactionary to anyone who disagrees with us that we can hardly function. Can't we have a rational conversation or just agree to disagree? I do not believe in boycotts or protests against certain institutions just because we oppose their beliefs. Many friends, family and people I love dearly have views diametrically opposed to my own. Does that mean I want to write them off? Does this mean I don't respect them? No and again no! This is a free country. We have the right to believe and orient our lives as we see fit and discuss and argue the same. I do believe these issues are important, but when discussions and arguments are over, let us take a deep breath, smile, keep loving each other and be grateful for the countless things we have in common. Otherwise, we may destroy ourselves.

Sunday, July 22, 2012

History

History


One of the problems in crime cases is reconstructing the crime when a number of witnesses are involved. When a historian decides to write, he or she must draw from witnesses, usually dead, then decide which ones are reliable and which ones are not. Often, most historians have an agenda for writing their piece of history and will quote the witnesses  suiting that agenda. Years ago, Lerner and Loewe wrote a musical, "Gigi," in which a song, "I Remember It Well," illustrates this point. The song is a duet performed by former lovers, Honore and Mamita, who are now aged. If you'd prefer to see the song performed, just do a search using the title.




I REMEMBER IT WELL
From "Gigi" (1958)
(Lyrics : Alan Jay Lerner / Frederick Loewe)


Honore & Mamita 

H: We met at nine
M: We met at eight
H: I was on time
M: No, you were late
H: Ah, yes, I remember it well
We dined with friends
M: We dined alone
H: A tenor sang
M: A baritone
H: Ah, yes, I remember it well
That dazzling April moon!
M: There was none that night
And the month was June
H: That's right. That's right.
M: It warms my heart to know that you
remember still the way you do
H: Ah, yes, I remember it well

H: How often I've thought of that Friday
M: Monday
H: night when we had our last rendezvous
And somehow I foolishly wondered if you might
By some chance be thinking of it too?
That carriage ride 
M: You walked me home
H: You lost a glove
M: I lost a comb
H: Ah, yes, I remember it well
That brilliant sky
M: We had some rain
H: Those Russian songs
M: From sunny Spain
H: You wore a gown of gold
M: I was all in blue
H: Am I getting old?
M: Oh, no, not you
How strong you were
How young and gay
A prince of love
In every way
H: Ah, yes, I remember it well




When my family gathers, although none of us is an historian, we go through that process. One begins to tell a story and soon is interrupted by a family member who gives the "more accurate" version of the story. As in the song, the consequences of accuracy or inaccuracy are usually small, as in the time I prayed the cat away. Our cat, Shakey by name, ate holes in each of our waterbeds. She climbed the curtains and tore them to shreds (my first exaggeration). I grew to hate the cat. 


One Friday evening, I came home exhausted and tired. No one else was home. Shakey started to whine and rub up against my leg. I finally looked out the window, up to the heavens and said in my mind "Dear God, will you please get rid of this cat for me?" I let Shakey out the back door and no one in the family has seen her since. To me it was a very spiritual experience and saved me from replacing countless waterbed mattresses.


In our family, Shakey's disappearance was a mystery. The kids were sad and I didn't say anything... for ten years. I finally told my children what had happened that Friday afternoon. They were irate and upset that I would tell them a story like that. They were convinced that I had killed the cat or taken her to animal control. Their version of that family historical event might go something like this:


     "Dad hated Shakey. One afternoon when no one else was around
     he either dropped Shakey off in the country or took her to the 
     pound. Then he tried to tell us this story about how he had prayed
     her away to cover his tracks."


What is the truth? The kids are right that I did not like the cat. Actually, I don't like any cats. The evidence is stacked against me. But I swear and promise my version is true. I am not the type of person to leave an animal in the country or to take one to the pound without consulting with the family.


If a tasteful reader, like me, does not care for cats, the wise reader will likely believe my story. However, a sympathetic cat lover, with cat hair throughout the couch and between the sheets of the bed would likely side with my children. Those who are religiously oriented might come down on my side. Those who are not believers likely will accept my children's' story.


History is like this. It is full of prejudice, supposition and fabrication. It is fun to read, but one shouldn't put too much stock in it.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Pixar Brave

I suppose it is my desire for quality, but I have always enjoyed the Pixar movies. Today I went with all of my grandchildren, except two, and saw "Brave," Pixar's latest effort. I'm supposing again that it may be my Scottish heritage, but I thoroughly enjoyed this film. "Brave" captured the spirit of the land, the people and touched something deep in my DNA. Although scary for the young ones, it was a fantastic film and I recommend it highly. Of course, having an independent red-headed daughter and granddaughter (and grandson!) was a definite influence too. Pixar has scored again!

Saturday, June 16, 2012

The Worst Thing That Can Happen in This Life.

I love cookies, all kinds of cookies. But the worst thing that can happen to an individual in this life is to bite into a delicious chocolate chip cookie and find that it is really a raisin cookie. Biting into a raisin cookie is great. I love 'em, but don't mix them with chocolate chip cookies! I'd rather experience Chinese water torture.

Two Things a Fat Old Person Needs

One of the worst things that can happen to a fat senior citizen is to have a slender doctor who does not understand the vicissitudes of trying to drop poundage. I advise two things for over weight old people: a fat doctor and a fat cardiologist!

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Good joke from my high school friend, Tom Painter!

Tom applied for a signalman's job on the railroad and met his new boss at the signal tower.
The boss gave Tom a pop quiz.
"What would you do if you realized two trains were heading towards each other on the same track?" he asked Tom.
"I'd switch one to another track," said Tom.
"What if the switch lever broke?", asked his boss.
"I'd run down the track and use the manual lever."
"What if the manual lever had been struck by lightning?" persisted the boss.
"I'd run back up here and use the phone to call the next signal tower," said Tom.
"What if the phone was busy?"
"I'd run down to the station and use the pay phone," replied Tom.
"What if the pay phone had been vandalized?" asked the boss.
Tom, tiring of this silly game, responded, "Well, I guess in that case I'd run into town and get my Uncle Leo."
The boss looked puzzled.
"Why on Earth would you do that?" he asked.
"Because Leo's never seen a train wreck," said Tom.

33 Challenges of The Book of Mormon


This has been around for a number of years, but is still worth reading.

Occasionally you hear someone say, "I could believe your Mormon Doctrine if I just didn't have to swallow the story about Joseph Smith being a man of God and that he translated the Book of Mormon from some golden plates which he claimed he had found on a hill side." It is even possible that you, yourself, have doubted his story. Well, let us consider some facts or conditions that must be complied with in order for you or someone else to produce a similar record under comparable conditions.

1. You must be 23-24 years of age.
2. You cannot be a college graduate, in fact, you can have only three years of schooling.
3. You must write a book with 239 Chapters, 54 of them about wars, 21 about history, 55 about prophecy, 71 about doctrine, 17 about missionaries, and 21 about the mission of Jesus Christ.
4. Whatever you write must be on the basis of what you now know; no research can be done.
5. You must write a history of an ancient country, such as Tibet, covering a period from 600 BC to 421 AD. Why? Cause you know nothing about Tibet.
6. You must include in your writings the history of two distinct and seperate nations, along with histories of different contemperary nations or groups of people, of which no one ever knew existed.
7. Your writings must describe the religious, economic, social, and political cultures and institutions of these two nations.
8. You must weave into your history the religion of Jesus Christ and the pattern of Christian living.
9. When you start to produce this record, covering a period of over 1,000 years, you must finish it in approximatly 80 days.
10. When you have finished you must not make any changes in the text. The first edition must stand forever.
11. After pauses for sleep and food, if you are dictating to a stenographer you must never ask to have the last paragraph or last sentence read back to you.
12. Your record must be about 522 pages with over 510 word per page. You must add 180 proper nouns to the English language. William Shakespeare only added 20.
13. You must announce that your "smooth narrative" is not fiction, but truth, yes, even that it is a sacred record of history.
14. In fact, your book must fulfill Bible prophecies; even in the exact manner in which it shall come forth, to whom given, its purpose and accomplishments (Respectively-Psalms 85:10-11, Isaih 29:11-14, Ezekial 37:18-21, etc.)
15. You must publish it to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people, declaring it to be the Word of God.
16. You must include with the record itself, the marvelous promise; "And when ye shall recieve these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God the Enternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, He will manifest the truth of it unto you by the power of the Holy Ghost" -Mor 3:5
17. Tens and hundreds of thousands must bear record to the world for the next 145 years that they know the record to be true, because they put the "promise" to the test and found it to be true, the truth manifested to them by the power of the Holy Ghost.
18. Thousands of great men, intellectual giants, and scholars must subscribe discipleship to the record and its movement even to the point of laying down their own lives for it.
19. Your descriptions of the culture and people in these civilizations of which you will write include, the manner of their written and spoken languages, type of buildings, geographic locations, governmental types, monetary system, types of tools and materials used, and many other facts completely unknown to the rest of the world.
20. There can be no flaw whatsoever in the entire record.
21. Yet, you must not make an absurd, impossible, or contradictory statement.
22. Even so, many of the facts, ideas, and statements given us as truth in your record must be entirely inconsistent, even the direct opposite of the prevailing beliefs of the world where very little is claimed to be known about these civilizations and their 1000 years of history.
23. You must invite the ablest scholars and experts to examine the text with care. You must strive diligently to see that your book gets into the hands of all those most eager to prove it a forgery and who are most competent to expose and flaw in it.
24. Through investigation, scientific evidence, and archaeological discoveries for the next 150+ years must verify your claims and prove even the minutest details of your history to be perfectly true, even to the types of roads they built.
25. After 150+ years of analysis, no claim or fact in the book is disproven, but all is vindicated. Other theories and ideas as to its origin, rise, and fall, leaving your claims as the only possible ones.
26. Internal and external prophecies must be confirmed and fulfilled in the next 150 years.
27. Three honest, accreditable witnesses must testify to the whole world that an angel from heaven appeared to them and showed them the ancient records from which you claim your record is translated. These three witnesses must never deny their testimony, not even upon their death bed.
28. You must call out of heaven the voice of the Redeemer to declare to the three witnesses that your record is true and that it is their responsibility to hear the testimony. They must handle and feel the engravings on the plates, and bear record of it. Again, they can never deny their testimony.
29. Eight other witnesses must testify to the world that they saw the ancient records in broad daylight and they that handled them and felt the engravings on the record.
30. The first three and the second eight witnesses must bear their testimony not for profit or gain, but under great personal sacrafice and severe persecution, even to their death.
31. You must find someone to finance your book with the understanding that neither he nor you will ever receive and monetary renumeration from it. You must sell the book at the cost of, or less than the cost of, its production value.
32. You must tell the world that the written record you have translated from was engraven gold plates, even though up until the time you make the claim, no one has ever found anywhere in past history any civilization using gold as a method of keeping records, and not until about 100 years later were any similar engraven gold plates found.
33. Finally, after suffering persecution and revilement for 20 years after you finish the book, you must willingly give your own life for your testimony that the record is from God. All the time you never make a profit or any other type of personal gain save it be your testimony of the work you brought forth.
Surely, no one without God's help could produce a similar record and comply with all of the above conditions. Wouldn't you say that Joseph Smith was indeed a man of good and that he was an instrument in God's hands to bring forth such a record?
© Copyrighted by Peter C. Covino, Jr. 1974